What is Agency Law?
An agent is a person who acts in the name of and behalf of another, having been given and assumed some degrees of authority. The law of agency is governed by Part X of the contracts Act 1950. The person for whom such act is done, or who is so represented, is called the "principal".
Agency is the relationship which subsists between the principal and the agent, who has beed authorised to act for him or represent him in dealings with others.
Example-
Party A appoints party B to sign the agreement on his behalf, here party A is called the principal and party B is his agent.
Who can become an agent?
Section 136 CA is any person who is eighteen years old and above and who is of sound mind may be a principal. As between the principal and third persons, any person may become an agent, but persons of unsound mind and who are below eighteen years of age are not liable towards their principal for acts done by them as agents.
Example-
If A employs ask B to buy some good from C on his behalf and C supplies the goods, A cannot allege that he is not liable to pay for the goods just because B is not at the age of majority. A still liable to pay C for the goods.
Types of Agents
1. General Agent
- is a process of the authority to carry our a broad range of transactions in the name and on the behalf of the principal.
- for example - as a purchasing agent or as a life insurance agent authorised to sign up customers for the home office.
- to restrict the general agents' authority, the principal must spell out the limitations explicitly, and even so the principal may be liable for any of the agents' acts in excess of the authority.
- one common form of a personal general agent is the person who hold another's power of attorney
- is a delegation of authority to another to act in his stead; it can be accomplished by executing a simple form.
General Power of Attorney
2. Special Agent
- is the one who has authority to act only in a specifically designated instance or in a specifically designed set of transactions.
- for example - a real estate broker is usually a special agent hired to find a buyer for the principal’s land.
Example-
Kelvin, the seller, appoints an agent Jane to find a buyer for his property. Jane's commission depends on the selling price, which, Kelvin states in a letter to her, "in any event maybe no less than $150,000." If Jane locates a buyer, Peter, who agrees to purchase the property for $160,000, her signature on the contract of sale will not bing Kelvin. As a special agent, Jane had authority only to find a buyer; she had no authority to sign the contract.
3. Subagent
- to carry out their duties, an agent will often need to appoint their own agents.
- these appointments may or may not authorised by the principal.
- the agent will necessarily conduct their business through agent of their own choosing.
- if the general agent had the express or implied authority of the principal to hire them.
- for legal purposes, they are agents for both of the principal and the principal’s general agent, and both are liable for the subagent’s conduct although normally the general agent agrees to be primarily liable.
4. Servent
- an agent employed by a employer to perform service is his affairs whore physical conduct in the performance of the service is controlled or is subject to the right to control my the employer.
- this is the restatement (second) of Agency, Section 2.
- until the nineteenth century, any employees whose work duties were subject to an employer was control.
5. Agency Coupled with an Interest
- an agent whose reimbursement depends on his continuing to have the authority to act as an agent if he has a property interest in the business.
- for example - customarily agrees to sell a literary work to a publisher in return for a percentage of all monies the author earns from the sale of the work.
- also acts as a collection agent to ensure that his commission will be paid.
Example for a real case in Malaysia regarding agency law-
SRM Meyappa Chettiar v Lim Lian Koo [1954] 20 MLJ 246
PC, the attorney of SC, entered into an agreement with the respondent under which the PC handed over to the respondent a piece of land belonging to his principal in consideration of RM 7,000/- and agreed ‘ upon the return of normal conditions, the vendor shall obtain a special power of attorney from the said SC now in India and execute the true and lawful transfer of the said land at the purchaser’s own expenses’. He further agreed that if he was unable to obtain the necessary power from his principal the RM7,000/- will be return to the respondent. At the trial, the learned judge held that the agreement had been satisfied by SC and therefore dismissed a claim for recovery of possession of the land. The Court of Appeal held that the terms of the agreement showed that PC was acting in his personal capacity and therefore the principal of ratification could not apply to the agreement
The principal only applies where the agent has professed to contract for his principal who afterwards ratifies.
The principal only applies where the agent has professed to contract for his principal who afterwards ratifies.
Tindal C.J in Wilson v Tumman [1843] 6 M&C 242
The act done for another, by a person, not assuming to act for himself, but for such other person, tough without any precedent authority whatever, becomes the act of the principal, if subsequently ratified by him, is the known and well established rule of law. In that case the principal is bound by the act, whether it be for his detriment or his advantage, and whether it to be founded on a tort or on a contract, to the same effects as by, and with all the consequences which follow from the same act done by his previous authority.
The agent must have a principal, who is in actual existence or capable of being ascertained, when a contract is made. No one can ratify a contract if he is not a party competent to a contract at the date of the contract.
The agent must have a principal, who is in actual existence or capable of being ascertained, when a contract is made. No one can ratify a contract if he is not a party competent to a contract at the date of the contract.